EVIDENCE TIMELINE
WHAT THEY KNEW & WHEN
1970s–1980s: Initial Health Concerns
1979 – First public studies begin linking TCDD (dioxin) exposure to cancer and reproductive harm.​
1980 – U.S. creates the Ranch Hand Study to track Vietnam veterans’ health.​
1984–1987 – Australia holds the Evatt Royal Commission, which acknowledges potential harm to Vietnam veterans but ignores second-generation effects.
1990s Worldwide Health Organisation
1997: WHO Classifies TCDD
The World Health Organization (IARC) classifies TCDD as a Group 1 carcinogen—the highest risk category for substances known to cause cancer in humans.
Report includes reproductive, developmental, immune system, and endocrine disruption evidence.
2000s: International Scientific Consensus Grows
2001–2006 – Studies begin documenting transgenerational effects in animals and humans.
2008 – U.S. National Academy of Sciences reports growing concern about second-generation effects but official recognition remains limited.
2010s: Ongoing Global Warnings
2012–2018 – Independent research in multiple countries
(U.S., Canada, South Korea, New Zealand) finds increased birth defects, cancers, autoimmune conditions, and neurodevelopmental disorders in children of exposed veterans.
Vietnam Red Cross reports up to 3 million people affected, including second and third generations.
2019–2022: Pressure on Governments
Veterans’ advocacy groups submit multiple requests for recognition of children’s health impacts.
The U.S. passes the Blue Water Navy Act, expanding recognition—but still no recognition for second-generation harm.
2023: Australian Reforms Ignore Children
DVA updates some services for veterans but continues to ignore evidence of harm to children.No recognition, no screening, no compensation, no data collection.
2025: Voices Rise
Children of veterans in Australia and globally begin submitting cases to international bodies like the UN and seeking Ombudsman investigations.
New public website launched to collect testimonies, evidence, and global pressure.
United Nations Warnings to Australia
April 2011: The UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) urged Australia to take immediate steps to address the needs of the children of veterans exposed to toxic chemicals.
February 2016: The UN Committee on the Rights of the Child (CRC) issued a formal recommendation, calling on Australia to recognize and support the children of Vietnam veterans exposed to Agent Orange.
March 2017: The UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR) reiterated the importance of recognizing the health and disability impacts of Agent Orange exposure on subsequent generations.
July 2018: The UN Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities issued a report highlighting Australia’s failure to provide support and recognition to individuals suffering from second-generation Agent Orange exposure.
April 2019: The UN Human Rights Committee expressed concerns about discriminatory health policies that exclude second-generation victims of Agent Orange exposure from support and care.
October 2020: The UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) once again urged Australia to address the intergenerational impacts of Agent Orange exposure, particularly in relation to health and disability rights.
​
2021 findings from the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women.
​
2024 warning from the UN Special Rapporteur on Human Rights and the Environment regarding military-related toxic harms and state neglect.