Institutional Complicity – Escalation Submitted

Subject: Final Confirmation of Institutional Complicity – Escalation Submitted

You were formally warned of legal exposure to crimes against humanity under international law, including ICC and UNTOC jurisdiction. You received clear legal documentation and timelines.

Your silence, following that notice, constitutes willful inaction. All visit logs, case numbers, and non-responses are now submitted as evidence of complicity.

The matter is no longer administrative — it is criminal.

Your institution is now under international review.

What I require from your institution:

1. A formal written acknowledgment of your receipt of all legal notices and the nature of the allegations raised.

   Legal basis: OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises (Chapters III and IV); Rome Statute Article 25(3); AML/CTF compliance laws.

2. An immediate internal investigation into your institution’s exposure to state-facilitated chemical war crimes, including financial links, support, or failure to report.

   Legal basis: OECD Due Diligence Guidance; UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (Principle 17); UNTOC Article 10.

3. Full disclosure of all internal discussions, documents, and decisions made after receiving my notices.

   Legal basis: UNTOC Article 10(4); OECD Disclosure standards; Rome Statute Article 25(3)(d) (contribution to crimes through omission).

4. A public statement of your institution’s position on this matter, including whether you have now referred this to financial crime regulators or international authorities.

   Legal basis: OECD Guidelines (Chapter VI – Consumer Interests); UN Principles for Responsible Banking; Transparency standards in ESG governance.

5. Financial redress for your institution’s role in compounding harm, obstructing justice, and enabling ongoing denial. This will be calculated separately from state obligations and will not reduce the criminal liability already incurred.

   Legal basis: Rome Statute Reparations Framework (Article 75); UN Basic Principles on the Right to Remedy and Reparation; Tort law principles applicable under international customary law.

6. Confirmation that your institution has alerted relevant oversight bodies, including AUSTRAC, Egmont Group, the World Bank, and law enforcement.

   Legal basis: FATF Recommendations; AML/CTF Act (Australia); UNTOC Article 5 and 7; OECD Anti-Corruption Guidelines.

7. A guarantee that you will not attempt to erase digital traces, manipulate data, or obstruct the international investigation now underway.

   Legal basis: Rome Statute Article 70 (Offences against the administration of justice); UNTOC Article 23 (Obstruction of justice); international audit and compliance preservation laws.

   
   
   
   

   You are hereby given until 10:00am AEST, Thursday 7 August 2025, to comply with the above requirements.

   Failure to do so will result in immediate escalation to AUSTRAC, the Egmont Group, the World Bank Integrity Vice Presidency, and inclusion in an updated ICC Annex as a complicit financial institution.

   Silence, at this point, will be treated as willful obstruction.

   
   
   
   

   You’re not just banking profits.

   You’re banking war crimes.

   And now the clock is ticking.

   
   

   

   
   
   
   

Warm Agent Orange Burns regards,

Danielle Stevens

We will always be a child of a Vietnam Veteran

https://agentorangechild.wixsite.com/agent-orange-child

A formal complaint has been lodged with the International Criminal Court for Crimes against Humanity. The final submission was the 1st of July 2025.

Australia ratified International treaties but failed to implement them into domestic laws.