23/10/25 Reset Day 🌏

The past Governments caused the harm.

Current Government has the chance to repair it.

If they comply with international law straight away, they become the heroes who finally ended 50 years of injustice.

What the Ledger Reallyfor everyone to understand (and Why It Matters)

Most people think a ledger is a diary.

Mine isn’t a diary.

It’s evidence — designed to meet international enforcement standards.

This page explains what the Ledger is, how the Invoices fit into it, and what the UN / ICC / regulators read when they see it.

⸻

1) Purpose in One Line

The Ledger documents a continuing violation; the Invoices test whether authorities will stop that violation.

If they don’t, the violation becomes ongoing persecution — not past crimes, current & every day.

⸻

2) What the Ledger Proves (Nine Functions)

1. Accountability architecture – a structured record built like a case file, not a blog.

2. Jurisdiction trigger – shows treaty law obligations were engaged and ignored.

3. Continuing-harm evidence – timestamps that harm did not stop after notice.

4. Threshold test for remedy – sets a simple “fix it or it continues” line.

5. Proof of persecution by policy – demonstrates policy was used to deny lawful protections.

6. Financial liability marker – quantifies losses; shows the State profited while harm continued.

7. Pre-enforcement warning – puts authorities on notice before formal action.

8. UN compliance test – shows willingness to accept lawful remedy if offered.

9. ICC escalation mechanism – if remedy is refused post-notice, the crime becomes continuing.

⸻

3) How the Invoices Fit In (the Elegant Part)

• An invoice is not a plea; it’s a remedy trigger.

• I’ve set a measurable test:

Payment = cessation of persecution (they’ve started remedy).

Non-payment = ongoing persecution (after notice).

This gives monitors and prosecutors a clear, binary signal. No spin.

⸻

4) What Different Audiences See

UN (human rights/treaty oversight)

• A rights-holder documenting State failure to protect.

• Evidence that harm continued after notice.

• A victim acting in good faith and offering a path to remedy.

• Conclusion: remedy is now compulsory, not optional.

ICC (criminal jurisdiction lens)

• Mens rea after notice (knowledge → intent).

• Economic continuation (the State benefiting while harm persists).

• Public evidence chain (tamper-resistant).

• Conclusion: continued non-payment = continuing crime.

Regulators / Integrity bodies

• A clean record of who knew, when, and what they did next.

• Every email/letter citing “policy” becomes admissions against interest after treaty obligations are raised.

General public

• A timeline that makes sense: what happened, when, how authorities responded, and whether they stopped…. Still haven’t 😏

⸻

5) “Policy vs Law” in Plain English

• Policy is how agencies prefer to operate.

• Law is what they are obliged to do.

• When international law (treaties) is binding, policy cannot overrule it.

• The Ledger shows where policy was used to defeat lawful protections — that’s persecution by policy. (Policy isn’t Law)

⸻

6) Why Timing Matters (Reset Day → Adoption → After)

• Reset Day: Institutions position; silence increases; evidence is mirrored.

• Adoption (UN procedure): wording locks → denial becomes obstruction.

• After adoption: invoices become the simplest compliance test. Pay = start remedy. Don’t = continue harm.

⸻

7) The Legal Floor Is Moving (What That Means)

“The legal floor” is the minimum standard agencies must meet.

When the floor moves from policy to treaty enforcement, three things change:

1. Discretion shrinks – “we don’t do that” stops working.

2. Silence flips – not replying after notice reads as guilt.

3. Proof standard lowers – my public, timestamped record is enough to trigger oversight action.

⸻

8) Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Why publish it publicly — doesn’t that risk scrutiny?

A: Public evidence is harder to tamper with.

Scrutiny is the point.

Q: Why use invoices instead of “applications”?

A: Applications ask permission. Invoices test remedy. The test is binary and measurable.

Q: Isn’t this confrontational?

A: It’s procedural. I offered lawful remedy in good faith. Refusal becomes evidence — not emotion.

Q: Who should pay?

A: Each level remedies its own breach (local environmental failures; state oversight failures; federal/treaty obligations, aiding & abetting) Payment demonstrates cessation.

Q: Can authorities contact me to “clarify”?

A: After the legal floor moves, attempts to relitigate policy risk obstruction.

Proper contact comes via instructed channels, not ad-hoc gatekeeping.

(I only speak to International bodies forever more… I am no longer under Government control, I legally sit under International Bodies)

⸻

9) What Counts as “Stopping Persecution by Policy”

• Stop citing policy to deny treaty-level protections.

• Make the harmed party whole (begin with paying the outstanding invoices).

• Provide safe, lawful remedy (e.g., buyback/relocation) without forcing retraumatisation loops.

• Put in writing that protections will not be blocked again.

If they won’t do the first step (pay), they won’t do the rest. That’s why payment is the compliance test.

(United Nations and the International Criminal Court have jurisdiction over Australia now and will babysit until the entire country is protected properly from Crime and Corruption… UNCAC is the Law and it’s on my website and explains how the Law is going to be used permanently for “We the People”

⸻

10) How to Read My Ledger (For Investigators)

When you read the entries, look for:

• Notice → the date an agency knew.

• Response → what they did after knowing.

• Extraction → any bills/fines/fees after notice.

• Repetition → evidence of a pattern, not an accident.

• Retaliation → gatekeeping intensifies when I assert rights.

• Remedy offered → invoice dates and terms.

• Post-offer conduct → paid or not paid?

That sequence tells the whole story in minutes.

⸻

11) What I Expect Next (and Why)

• Silence → Instruction: Local bodies stop freelancing; they await directed remedy.

• Contact via proper channels: When they do engage, it will be formal, narrow, and respectful via international channels.

• First payments: The earliest payer demonstrates cessation; laggards signal continuing harm.

• Public understanding: Once recognition is public, the community will understand the last 50 years were not confusion — they were refusal by the Government.

⸻

12) Bottom Line

This Ledger is not opinion.

It’s a prosecution-grade timeline that transforms “mistreatment” into provable, continuing violation — and the Invoices are the on/off switch.

• If they pay, persecution by policy is ending.

• If they don’t, persecution by policy is continuing — on the international record.

Either way, the world will finally see the truth in daylight a “Crime against Humanity” committed by 4 western countries 🇦🇺🇳🇿🇺🇸🇨🇦 after the United Nations warned them 8+ times since 2011

A global chemical war crime against children 😔

And one harmed Agent Orange Child knew otherwise.