AHPRA Lied

Subject: Formal Response to Complaint Outcome – Ref 12809802

Dear Ahpra,

I am writing in response to your 26 June 2025 letter regarding my complaint (Ref 12809802). Your conclusion is both factually incorrect and procedurally unjust.

Contrary to your statement, I did name the practitioners involved in my complaint. The assertion that “no identifying particulars” were provided is false and demonstrably contradicted by the documentation I submitted. That alone invalidates your justification under section 149(1)(a) of the National Law.

Additionally, you acknowledged that I had further evidence available — including medical imaging, WHO-cited research, and formal diagnoses — yet the Board’s delegate chose not to request it. This is not an oversight. It is a deliberate choice to close a complaint while avoiding the evidence.

Your response demonstrates a pattern of systemic obstruction, not administrative neutrality. It reflects a regulatory culture more concerned with shielding practitioners than investigating credible harm. That harm includes medical failures linked to toxic exposure, a matter of international concern and part of a formal complaint I have now submitted to the International Criminal Court under Article 15 of the Rome Statute.

Your decision, and your failure to review what was actually submitted, is now part of that record. It will be included in Annex C of my ICC submission as an example of procedural deflection and deliberate denial of accountability.

If this agency cannot identify a named doctor in a complaint where they were clearly named, that is not an administrative limit — it is institutional blindness by design.

Your obstruction of Justice is included in the International Criminal Court submission… Lawyer up buttercup.