CBA Escalation, Moody’s Case Number

agentorangechild
Aug 27
4 min read

Updated: Aug 28

Subject: Formal Escalation – Commonwealth Bank Complicity in Sovereign Securities Fraud, Prudential Breaches, and Crimes Against Humanity

Dear Commonwealth Bank Compliance,

Your refusal to investigate my notification (15 August) will be treated as evidence of complicity in systemic fraud and international crimes. By denying responsibility for liabilities tied to treaty breaches and UN findings, CBA is attempting to conceal exposures that are central to your role as the largest holder of Australian sovereign bonds and ESG-linked funds.

The Record Now Shows CBA Complicity in:

Sovereign Securities Fraud

Continued underwriting, trading, and exposure to Australian sovereign bonds despite known treaty breaches and UN findings.
Omission of these liabilities in investor disclosures and ESG reports = fraudulent misrepresentation to markets.

Prudential and Market Integrity Failures

Breach of Basel Core Principles, APRA Prudential Standards, and ASIC disclosure obligations.
Failure to disclose material risks constitutes market manipulation and systemic fraud.

Insurance and Reinsurance Fraud

Participation in financial structures that concealed liabilities through insurers and reinsurers (Swiss Re, Allianz, QBE).
Direct exposure through CBA’s insurance subsidiaries and partnerships.

Aiding and Abetting Crimes Against Humanity (Rome Statute, Art. 25(3)(c))

By concealing and denying sovereign liabilities tied to intergenerational TCDD (Agent Orange) harm, CBA is complicit in the cover-up of chemical war crimes against children.
Every denial is evidence of intent.

Obstruction of Justice (Rome Statute, Art. 70)

Refusal to investigate after formal notice = obstruction.
Silence, denial, and procedural dismissal are now documented as deliberate acts of non-cooperation.

Escalation Pathway

Your position has been fixed in the following records:

International Criminal Court (ICC) – Article 15 submission lodged, CBA named in Annex B.
OECD National Contact Points – Case 36, international coordination pending.
Basel Committee, IOSCO, IAIS – notified of prudential and disclosure failures.
Ratings Agencies (Moody’s, S&P, Fitch) – notified of undisclosed sovereign liabilities.
World Bank, IMF, ECB – systemic fraud flagged as sovereign risk.
Egmont Group / FATF / AUSTRAC – notified of transnational organised crime implications.

Conclusion

CBA is now formally documented as:

Complicit in sovereign securities fraud.
Complicit in insurance fraud.
Complicit in aiding and abetting crimes against humanity.
Actively engaged in obstruction of justice.

This record will stand in The Hague, in financial oversight bodies, and in history.

Warm Agent Orange Burns regards,

Danielle Stevens

We will always be a child of a Vietnam Veteran

https://agentorangechild.wixsite.com/agent-orange-child

A formal complaint has been lodged with the International Criminal Court for Crimes against Humanity. The final submission was the 1st of July 2025.

Australia ratified International treaties but failed to implement them into domestic laws.

When the United Nations tells you 8+ times you are breaking the law, YOU ARE BREAKING THE LAW. Stockholm Convention & Agent Orange is a chemical war crime against children.

Profit before People is a crime.

Dear Danielle

I refer to my response of 11 August and your further 2 emails, including that which appears below.

Prior to responding, CBA did investigate the allegations in relation to the entities named in your email. As noted in my response, confidentiality obligations prevent me from confirming whether or not the named entities or their subsidiaries are customers of the Bank and as such I am unable to provide the further details you requested. However, CBA does recognise that as part of its responsibility to respect human rights under the UNGPs there are circumstances which may require it to carry out enhanced due diligence on customers. Any customer specific actions prompted by such due diligence are also subject to confidentiality.

In my previous email, I also provided a link to our E&S Framework. This framework was updated on 13 August 2025 with the release of our annual reporting. The latest version is available at CBA 2025 Environmental & Social Framework.

For the record, CBA denies the allegations documented in the conclusion to your email below. While we appreciate you raising these allegations with us, given our clear response to them, we do not propose to engage in further correspondence along these lines.

Regards

Sharona

Subject: Formal Correction – CBA Liability and Moody’s Case #06121204

Dear Sharona,

Thank you for your response of 27 August 2025. I must formally correct your statement that CBA “denies the allegations documented in the conclusion” of my email.

On 26 August 2025, Moody’s Compliance formally logged this matter under Case #06121204. This establishes that the allegations are not speculative, but have been recognised at the global ratings level as material to sovereign securities integrity and disclosure obligations.

In your response you acknowledge:

That CBA investigated the allegations in relation to named entities.

That CBA recognises its responsibility under the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) to carry out enhanced due diligence where risks are identified.

These admissions cannot stand alongside a denial. They confirm:

CBA has knowledge of the allegations.

CBA recognises they fall under international human rights obligations.

CBA refuses transparency on whether due diligence was actually carried out, citing confidentiality.

Your denial therefore constitutes misrepresentation. It does not erase the record that CBA:

Investigated,

Recognised UNGP obligations,

And then chose not to disclose outcomes.

This selective transparency itself breaches the OECD Guidelines (Ch. III – Disclosure; Ch. IV – Human Rights). It will be annexed to the International Criminal Court and the OECD National Contact Point as evidence of deliberate obstruction of justice and systemic disclosure failure.

The evidence is now on the record. The silence is yours.