
DVA Lawyers Misconduct
- agentorangechild
- Jul 21
- 2 min read
Updated: Jul 25
Dear Ms Wong, Ms Foat, Mr White, Ms Winkler, and Ms Martin,
This is formal notice of your personal and professional implication in a matter now before the International Criminal Court (ICC) under Article 15 of the Rome Statute. I am the named complainant.
You have each played a role—either by action, silence, or strategic deflection—in the systemic denial of redress for intergenerational harm caused by TCDD (Agent Orange) exposure. This denial has violated multiple ratified international treaties including:
The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969)
The Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants
The Convention on the Rights of the Child
The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court
Your legal advice, decision-making, or failure to intervene has supported policies that suppress lawful entitlements, obstruct recognition of chemical war crimes, and prolong harm to civilians—particularly children of Vietnam veterans. These are not “administrative oversights.” They are acts of legal strategy in direct breach of international law.
If you believe this submission is incorrect or unjustified, you are invited to respond in writing, citing the domestic or international legal basis under which this conduct is defensible.
This email has been copied to the Law Council of Australia, relevant State Legal Ethics Committees, and the ICC registry. You are now on record. Any further silence will be treated as acknowledgment and complicity.
Warm Agent Orange Burns regards,
Danielle Stevens
We will always be a child of a Vietnam Veteran
A formal complaint has been lodged with the International Criminal Court for Crimes against Humanity. The final submission was the 1st of July 2025.
Australia ratified International treaties but failed to implement them into domestic laws.


Comments