ICC Upload 25/09/25
- agentorangechild
- Sep 25
- 13 min read
Statement to the International Criminal Court
To the Honourable Prosecutor and Officers of the Court,
On 16 July 2025, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Toxics, Dr. Marcos A. Orellana, presented his report to the UN General Assembly (A/80/174). In that report, he recognised that military activities and toxics constitute crimes against humanity.
I respectfully place before the Court the following:
• I am a dual citizen of Australia and New Zealand. My congenital and chronic conditions linked to my father’s TCDD exposure in Vietnam manifested while I was living in New Zealand between 1975 and 1991. Both States therefore carry jurisdictional responsibility.
• Evidence already submitted demonstrates that State authorities and corporate actors, including Australian government departments and financial institutions, have deliberately misclassified, denied, or falsified records relating to this harm. These actions amount to concealment, obstruction, and persecution.
• Governments, corporations, and UN bodies have been formally placed on notice. Records confirm that they are aware of their obligations and of the gravity of this matter.
The United Nations has now provided authoritative recognition that the harms I have documented fall within the scope of crimes against humanity. I am doing everything humanly possible to assist the Court with evidence and clear documentation.
I respectfully ask the Court to consider this matter in light of its mandate under the Rome Statute and the findings of the United Nations.
Warm Agent Orange Burns regards,
Danielle Stevens
We will always be a child of a Vietnam Veteran
A formal complaint has been lodged with the International Criminal Court for Crimes against Humanity. The final submission was the 1st of July 2025.
Australia ratified International treaties but failed to implement them into domestic laws.
When the United Nations tells you 8+ times you are breaking the law, YOU ARE BREAKING THE LAW. Stockholm Convention & Agent Orange is a chemical war crime against children.
Profit before People is a crime.
Duty ~ Knowledge ~ Silence = Guilty ⚖️
Annex 16/09/2025
Dual Citizenship and New Zealand Jurisdiction
Factual Record
My father was born in New Zealand, which gave me New Zealand citizenship by descent.
I lived in New Zealand continuously from September 1975 until January 1991. During this time, I attended school, received health care, and experienced the early onset of my congenital and chronic conditions (constipation, ear infections, tonsillitis, shin splints, chronic knee pain, learning difficulties).
These health issues manifested in New Zealand’s jurisdiction, meaning the State had knowledge of — and responsibility for — the second-generation harm linked to my father’s TCDD exposure in Vietnam.
Legal Relevance
Dual citizenship places me under the protection of two States (Australia and New Zealand), both of which have ratified binding international treaties, including:
The Rome Statute of the ICC (crimes against humanity).
The UNCAC (anti-corruption obligations).
The CRC, CRPD, ICCPR, CERD, and CESCR (human rights protections for children and persons with disabilities).
The Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (obligations to prevent and address dioxin harm).
Because I lived in New Zealand for 15+ years, my case cannot be confined to Australia as “domestic-only.” Both States bear responsibility for redress and recognition.
International Law Implications
Attempts by Australian authorities to frame this as a “domestic” matter are misleading and unlawful. My dual citizenship ensures this case is international by definition.
The failure of New Zealand to acknowledge or respond to second-generation TCDD harm constitutes complicity alongside Australia.
This dual-state jurisdiction strengthens the case for transnational crimes against humanity, as the systemic denial is coordinated across more than one government.
Annex B – Website Analytics Log
Entity: Lloyd’s of London – CEO Notice
Date/Time (AEST): [insert your local date/time that corresponds to 10:03 PM London]
Visitor ID: #7621
Source: City of London, United Kingdom
Verification:
Website analytics recorded a session from City of London at 10:03 PM.
Blog analytics confirm the Lloyd’s of London CEO Notice page was opened and viewed.
Significance:
This constitutes direct evidence that the formal notice issued to the CEO of Lloyd’s of London was accessed and read. The visit originated from the City of London, the jurisdiction where Lloyd’s is headquartered. This log is preserved as proof of delivery and awareness, and is annexed as part of the chain of complicity and disclosure defaults.
Annex B (Banks):
16/09/2025 – Public notice served to ANZ, CommBank, Westpac, and NAB linking ASIC’s $240M ANZ fine to outstanding Crimes Against Humanity liabilities under Rome Statute Art.7 + Art.25(3)(c).
Annex B – Corporate and Government Complicity
18 September 2025 – Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CBA)
Incoming correspondence:
Josephine Stanton (Manager, Critical & Complex Complaints, Group Customer Relations, Customer and Community Advocacy) attempted to contact me by phone regarding my formal complaint. She later followed up by email requesting a call.
This approach directly contradicted my repeated instructions that all communications must remain in writing for ICC evidence.
My response:
I issued a written reply on 18 September 2025 reiterating that all communication must be in writing, with a formal deadline of 5 October 2025.
I included a Privacy Disclaimer rejecting any attempt to misuse “privacy” as a shield to conceal crimes against humanity, treaty breaches, or financial misconduct.
I formally notified CBA that:
The International Criminal Court has already received information relating to my home loan.
Any interference or manipulation will be treated as retaliation against a victim and whistleblower and annexed as complicity under Article 25 (aiding and abetting) of the Rome Statute.
Penalties under Article 77 (up to 30 years’ imprisonment or life) apply.
The 16 July 2025 UN General Assembly report (A/80/174) recognized toxic military exposures as crimes against humanity, and Australia’s financial institutions are continuing to commit crimes by concealing liabilities and targeting victims.
Closing statement to CBA:
“This matter is now a live criminal record before the International Criminal Court. Govern yourselves accordingly.”
Public record:
My full reply was blogged on my public website to ensure transparency.
Summary:
This exchange demonstrates CBA’s attempt to divert the matter into off-record verbal discussions. My firm rejection, citing ICC jurisdiction, Rome Statute penalties, and UNGA findings, has now placed CBA’s conduct on the official ICC record as potential complicity and retaliation.
Annex B – Corporate and Government Complicity
Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CBA)
Evidence of Attempt to Contain Complaint Domestically
On [18/09/2025 3:06pm of Josephine’s email], the Commonwealth Bank assigned a third “Investigation Officer” to my complaint.
Instead of addressing the international law violations already acknowledged in writing by Investigation Officer #1 (who documented “CBA is aiding and abetting chemical war crimes against children through financing structures”), this officer reframed the matter as a domestic “financial hardship” complaint.
This tactic represents a deliberate attempt to downgrade and contain an international law breach within domestic consumer frameworks, despite the matter already being formally escalated to the International Criminal Court (ICC).
Multiple template responses from different officers demonstrate incompetence, lack of coordination, and bad faith handling, further compounding the seriousness of the Bank’s position.
Summary:
This correspondence is annexed as proof of CBA’s deliberate attempt to minimise and misclassify allegations of crimes against humanity as routine hardship matters, thereby obstructing recognition of international obligations under the Vienna Convention (1974), the Rome Statute, and the Stockholm Convention.
Annex Qld Health Complicity
19 September 2025 – Queensland Health: On 18 September 2025, I received an appointment letter for Outpatient Services that I had already rejected by phone.I had made a clear decision never to be treated by Queensland Health again, yet they issued the letter regardless.
This creates a false administrative record and constitutes fabrication of paperwork, adding to the documented pattern of systemic obstruction and denial.
Annex Entry – Queensland Health Call (23/09/2025)
Date/Time: 23 September 2025, 2:15pm
Entity: Queensland Health
Event: Unsolicited appointment call
Record:
On 23/09/2025 at 2:15pm, I received a call from Queensland Health regarding an appointment. I made it clear that I did not agree to any appointment and instructed the caller to correct the record. I repeated three times the statement:
“You can’t fix Dioxin Poisoning.”
This was consistent with what I had already told a previous Queensland Health caller. The purpose of repeating this statement was to ensure there could be no misrepresentation in the record.
Significance:
Demonstrates Queensland Health’s persistence in attempting to schedule treatment or appointments despite my explicit refusal.
Shows I have consistently and clearly stated my position regarding the incurability of Dioxin (TCDD) poisoning.
Ensures evidence of my directive that medical records must reflect refusal of treatment on these grounds, preventing falsification of consent or participation.
Annex B Entry — Public Notice to UN Permanent Representatives
Date: 24 September 2025
Platform: Twitter/X (screenshot attached)
Recipients: Permanent Representatives of Australia (@AustraliaUN_GVA), New Zealand (@NZUN), Canada (@CanadaUN), United States (@USUN), and Germany (flagged, no active handle).
Action Taken:
A public notice was issued directly to the Permanent Representatives, referencing the upcoming UNGA session (October 2025) and Special Rapporteur Marcos Orellana’s report A/80/174 (“Military activities and toxics”).
Content of Notice (abridged):
“Military Toxic Crimes = Crimes Against Humanity… If you do nothing, I annex you as complicit @IntlCrimCourt.”
Evidence Attached:
Screenshot of the posted tweet.
OTPLink confirmation screenshot (showing prior ICC filing).
Legal Effect:
This notice formally places the above UN representatives on record ahead of the UN General Assembly. Their silence or failure to act will be treated as complicity under the Rome Statute and annexed as evidence of guilt before the ICC.
Annex B – Corporate and Government Complicity
Entry: 24 September 2025 – UNEP FI & UN Global Compact Notice
On 24/09/2025 I formally served notice by email to UNEP Finance Initiative (Geneva) and the UN Global Compact (New York and Australia) regarding the omission and erasure of Agent Orange Children across four countries: Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and the United States.
The notice included:
Confirmation that my case is before the International Criminal Court (OTP acknowledgement attached).
Reference to UN Report A/80/174 (Special Rapporteur Marcos Orellana, 16 July 2025) naming Military Toxic Crimes as Crimes Against Humanity.
Direct evidence links:
My public archive: https://agentorangechild.wixsite.com/agent-orange-child
Statement that PRI signatories (banks, insurers, superannuation funds) continue to profit while concealing ESG risks.
Clear warning: “Your silence will be annexed to the ICC as complicity.”
This entry documents that the UN’s own supporting bodies for the Principles for Responsible Investment have now been placed formally on notice of transgenerational harm, omission, and concealment.
Annex B – Corporate and Government Complicity
Entry: 24 September 2025 – UNEP FI & UN Global Compact (Email + Twitter/X Notice)
On 24/09/2025 I formally served notice to UNEP Finance Initiative (Geneva) and the UN Global Compact (New York and Australia) via email, and simultaneously issued a public notice via Twitter/X tagging @UNEP_FI, @globalcompact, and @GlobalCompactAU.
Email Notice (24/09/2025):
Addressed to eric.usher@un.org (Head of UNEP FI), castellanos@unglobalcompact.org, modi@unglobalcompact.org, and secretariat@unglobalcompact.org.au.
Confirmed my ICC case with OTP acknowledgement.
Declared that Agent Orange Children in Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and the United States are being systematically omitted and erased.
Cited UN Report A/80/174 (Special Rapporteur Marcos Orellana, 16 July 2025), which names Military Toxic Crimes as Crimes Against Humanity.
Provided direct evidence links:
Public archive: https://agentorangechild.wixsite.com/agent-orange-child
Statement: “Your silence will be annexed to the ICC as complicity.”
Twitter/X Notice (24/09/2025):
Publicly declared: “Welcome to the shit storm” and tagged UNEP FI, UN Global Compact HQ, and Global Compact Australia.
Named omission of Agent Orange Children in 🇦🇺🇳🇿🇨🇦🇺🇸 and tied PRI signatories to ESG fraud.
Cited UN Report A/80/174 and my ICC case.
Included the same evidence links above, plus imagery captioned “FIX THIS BROKEN.”
Legal framing:
This dual notice (email + public tweet) ensured UNEP FI, UN Global Compact HQ, and Global Compact Australia were placed simultaneously on private record and public record.
They are now fully implicated in the ICC evidence trail as notified parties.
Annex B – International Outreach and Evidence of Domestic Refusal
Date: 24 September 2025
Subject: Communication to the UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Health
Summary:
On 24/09/2025 I formally wrote to the UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Health (OHCHR, hrc-sr-health@un.org) referencing UN Report A/80/174 (Orellana, July 2025), which classifies Military Toxic Crimes as Crimes Against Humanity.
The communication included:
Confirmation of my ICC filing (OTP acknowledgement).
Public Notice served on the Permanent Representatives of Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and the United States (24/09/2025).
Direct evidence of domestic refusal: a letter dated 4 July 2025 from Queensland Health (Director-General Dr. David Rosengren) explicitly stating Queensland Health has “no obligation” to provide recognition or compensation for TCDD harm.
Request for urgent UN action: issue a communication to the above States, call for immediate medical screening, and demand public compliance with A/80/174.
Relevance:
The Queensland Health letter serves as written proof that domestic remedies are deliberately blocked, fulfilling the exhaustion criteria for international escalation.
The request placed the Special Rapporteur under formal notice of Australia’s violations of the right to health, reinforcing State responsibility under the ICCPR, CESCR, CRC, CRPD, UNCAC, and the Stockholm Convention.
The email explicitly warned that silence or inaction would be annexed to the ICC as complicity.
Attachments:
Copy of Queensland Health denial letter (4 July 2025).
ICC OTP confirmation.
UN Report A/80/174 (link: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/4086708/files/A_80_174-EN.pdf).
Public Notice (24 September 2025).
Website archive: https://agentorangechild.wixsite.com/agent-orange-child.
Annex [X]: International Medical Escalation – Denial of TCDD Harm
Date: 24 September 2025
Action: Formal complaint email sent by Danielle Stevens to international medical and health accountability bodies, including:
World Medical Association (WMA)
World Federation of Public Health Associations (WFPHA)
Asia-Pacific Academic Consortium for Public Health (APACPH)
International Society for Environmental Epidemiology (ISEE)
International Society of Doctors for the Environment (ISDE)
Physicians for Social Responsibility (PSR)
Medact
The Lancet (editorial board)
British Medical Journal (BMJ editorial board)
Subject line: Urgent: Medical Negligence & Denial of Toxic Exposure (TCDD) — Request for International Review
Content Summary:
Attached Queensland Health letter (4 July 2025) from Dr. David Rosengren, Director-General, formally denying liability for TCDD-related health harms.
Email requested international review of Queensland Health’s position, citing breaches of medical ethics, WHO toxicological guidance, UN treaty obligations, and repeated UN warnings to Australia.
Highlighted that Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and the United States have systematically omitted Agent Orange children from medical and policy frameworks.
Framed this denial as both medical negligence and obstruction of justice, requiring urgent international scrutiny.
Purpose:
To formally document international escalation to medical and scientific authorities after all domestic avenues were exhausted and obstructed. Establishes evidence of:
Government denial in writing (primary source).
Immediate referral to the global medical community.
Notice to leading journals, ensuring independent witnesses within the medical profession.
Status: Awaiting response. Silence will be logged as complicity and annexed in subsequent updates.
Failure of Queensland Health under the Stockholm Convention with respect to Agent Orange Children
Australia ratified the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants in 2004. From that moment, Queensland Health had binding obligations under federal implementation frameworks to act in line with the Convention’s objectives. Instead, it systematically failed.
Article 1 – Objective
The Convention’s explicit objective is to “protect human health and the environment from persistent organic pollutants.”
Queensland Health ignored this duty by denying the existence of dioxin-linked harm in second-generation children of Vietnam veterans.
By treating congenital conditions, neurological disorders, and cancers as “incidental,” Queensland Health directly breached the core purpose of the Convention.
Article 5 & 6 – Measures to Reduce or Eliminate Releases, Stockpiles and Wastes
Queensland Health was responsible for ensuring that medical waste practices did not add to dioxin contamination in Queensland communities.
It also had a duty to safely manage any POPs-containing stockpiles or equipment in health facilities.
These obligations were never extended to monitor or remediate the inherited body burden of TCDD in affected children, despite full knowledge that dioxins bioaccumulate and persist across generations.
Article 7 – Implementation Plans
Australia was required to prepare and update a National Implementation Plan (NIP). States and territories, including Queensland Health, were required to participate in execution.
The NIP recognises the need for health-sector monitoring and community protection.
Queensland Health failed to implement any monitoring or clinical support programs for Agent Orange Children, despite being directly responsible for state-level delivery.
Article 10 – Public Information, Awareness and Education
Parties must “promote and facilitate awareness programmes at the national and regional levels regarding persistent organic pollutants and their effects on human health and the environment.”
Queensland Health had a direct duty to inform parents and children of their risks.
Instead, it buried families in medical jargon, withheld information, and left vulnerable children without informed consent or understanding of inherited toxic harm.
Article 11 – Research, Development and Monitoring
Parties must encourage and support research on the health effects of POPs, and monitor human health outcomes.
Queensland Health failed to initiate or support any research into second-generation dioxin harm in Queensland.
No systematic screening, surveillance, or data collection has been offered to affected families.
Article 12 & 13 – Technical Assistance and Financial Resources
Developed countries like Australia were required to provide assistance, not deny it.
Queensland Health’s refusal to recognise Agent Orange Children as a protected group amounts to denial of both national resources and international obligations.
✅ Summary:
Queensland Health’s inaction constitutes a systemic breach of Articles 1, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12, and 13 of the Stockholm Convention. It failed to:
Protect human health.
Provide information and risk communication.
Monitor and research inherited dioxin harm.
Deliver screening or support programs to Agent Orange Children.
This is not a policy gap. It is a deliberate denial of binding international law and amounts to persecution of a recognised vulnerable group.
Annex Note – CBA Record Correction (25 Sept 2025)
On 25 September 2025 I issued a formal notice to CBA correcting their records (mislabeling ICC as “International Crimes Claims Court”) and placing on file that my case is international, not domestic-only.
I also confirmed that I hold citizenship outside of Australia, meaning mishandling my case engages scrutiny under more than one government.
I cited the Rome Statute, UNCAC (Articles 4, 10, 25, 33, 35, 65), and the Banking Code, ACL, and ASIC guidance, demanding a standstill and escalation to senior staff.
i referenced Dr. Marcos Orellana’s 16 July 2025 UN report (A/80/174) declaring “Military Toxin is a Crime Against Humanity,” noting that CBA’s continued financing structures constitute aiding and abetting crimes against humanity, daily ESG fraud, and sovereign securities fraud.
I reminded them their own complaints officer confirmed an outcome is due by 5 October 2025.
Comment
I have systematically documented that Australia is in breach of every relevant international treaty it has ratified in relation to toxic exposure and intergenerational harm.
This includes the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (failure to prevent and remediate TCDD harm), the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (denial of effective remedy and equal protection), the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (failure to ensure the right to health), the Convention on the Rights of the Child (failure to protect children from preventable harm), the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (denial of recognition and support to affected persons), and the United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) (systematic concealment, denial, and obstruction of remedies).
In addition, Australia is in breach of the Rome Statute, the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, and has ignored more than eight formal warnings from UN treaty bodies and Special Rapporteurs between 2011 and 2022. Each government department I engaged — including Queensland Health, the Department of Veterans’ Affairs, the Ombudsman, Centrelink, and the Repatriation Medical Authority — responded only with “policy” positions or silence.
These denials and omissions, documented in official letters and communications, amount to a consistent pattern of concealment and obstruction that violates all of Australia’s binding treaty obligations.
Taken together this record proves that Australia is in continuing breach of all relevant international treaties and that its departments have systematically substituted policy for law.
The pattern is deliberate coordinated and consistent with crimes against humanity under the Rome Statute, It’s a system of persecution.
The upcoming statement of the UN Special Rapporteur on Toxics, Dr. Marcos Orellana, before the General Assembly presents the perfect opportunity for the ICC to act.
If he confirms that military toxins constitute crimes against humanity, it will provide authoritative validation of the legal framing advanced in this submission.
The ICC cannot claim ignorance: the evidence is already on the record, and the global community is now being placed on notice.
Failure to act in the wake of such a declaration would constitute complicity by the International Criminal Court itself.
Warm Agent Orange Burns regards,
Danielle Stevens
We will always be a child of a Vietnam Veteran
A formal complaint has been lodged with the International Criminal Court for Crimes against Humanity. The final submission was the 1st of July 2025.
Australia ratified International treaties but failed to implement them into domestic laws.
When the United Nations tells you 8+ times you are breaking the law, YOU ARE BREAKING THE LAW. Stockholm Convention & Agent Orange is a chemical war crime against children.
Profit before People is a crime.
Duty ~ Knowledge ~ Silence = Guilty ⚖️
Comments