Illegal Transfer Request 🙄

Subject: UN Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime – Final Notice of Escalation

This case falls under the United Nations Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime (UNTOC). You were warned. You deflected. You failed to act.

This is your final notice.

At 10:00am Thursday AEST, I will escalate this matter formally through the UNTOC mechanism, naming:

• The Australian National Contact Point (AusNCP),

• The Australian Government (Treasury, Office of International Law),

• All implicated legal officers,

• All OECD actors knowingly enabling this obstruction.

This case is not administrative. It is criminal.

Your attempted closure, reinterpretation of my statements, and rerouting to the U.S. are unlawful.

You do not have the authority to:

• Transfer this complaint to another jurisdiction,

• Declare a “final statement,”

• Or bury a complaint that names your own government as complicit in ongoing crimes against children.

You are the NCP of the host country responsible for OECD violations.

You were formally placed on notice in May.

You were reminded in June.

You were warned in July.

You ignored all of it.

Your conduct constitutes procedural obstruction, treaty breach, and complicity in a transnational cover-up of chemical warfare crimes against civilians.

This is now under review by:

• The International Criminal Court (ICC),

• The International Bar Association (IBA), and

• The International Bar Association Human Rights Institute (IBAHRI).

Do not contact me again unless:

1. You confirm immediate transfer of this case to a neutral NCP Netherlands

2. Or you provide formal written redress.

If you remain silent or publish a final statement, that silence will be treated as complicity under international law and submitted as evidence to all global authorities currently monitoring this case.

After that, your silence will speak for you — forever.

Warm Agent Orange Burns regards,

Danielle Stevens

We will always be a child of a Vietnam Veteran

https://agentorangechild.wixsite.com/agent-orange-child

A formal complaint has been lodged with the International Criminal Court for Crimes against Humanity. The final submission was the 1st of July 2025.

Australia ratified International treaties but failed to implement them into domestic laws.

OFFICIAL: Sensitive

Dear Ms Stevens

I wish to keep you updated on this matter. One of the companies has requested a short extension (to 4 August 2025) to respond to my letter. I consider that reasonable. So I am extending the response date to 4 August 2025 for all parties. This includes for any further submissions you would like to make in response to my letter of 11 July and/or my email of 15 July (copied below).

I realise you have earlier indicated concerns about the AusNCP’s continued dealing with this complaint, and I explained the relevant procedures in my email of 15 July (below). To help you to decide what is best for you in this situation, I outline the three possible options from this point.

The first path is transfer of your current complaint to the US NCP

This will occur if I hear nothing further from you, and nothing from the companies which changes my preliminary assessment that the AusNCP is not the correct body to handle this complaint and it should be transferred to the US NCP. This would mean the complaint would be transferred to the US NCP, to make an initial assessment of whether the issues raised warrant further examination. Before that occurred, the AusNCP would publish a ‘transfer statement’ (per para 35 of our procedures) which would be a short document with little detail about the case. A draft of this statement would be provided to all parties for comment, before it is finalised and published. The complaint would then be managed by the US NCP in accordance with their procedures and the OECD Guidelines.

The second path is withdrawal of your complaint to the AusNCP

This will occur if you indicate that further engagement from AusNCP is not required. You may have intended that in your 14 July email to the AusNCP, but I wished to clarify that before proceeding that way. If the complaint is withdrawn (or if I understand you do no longer what the AusNCP to continue with the complaint), then the AusNCP would publish a final statement (per para 100 and 57-69 of our procedures). This would be a longer document, explaining the parties’ respective positions, the steps taken by the AusNCP, the parties’ engagement in the process, and will include the issues raised. A draft of this statement would be provided to all parties for comment, before it is finalised and published. There would then be no complaint under active consideration by AusNCP or the US NCP.

The third path is the complaint remains with the AusNCP for initial assessment

This will only occur if (1) you explain why there are exceptional reasons for AusNCP to handle a complaint instead of another NCP (procedures para 25), and (2) there is new information/material which demonstrates the Guidelines’ issue you raised in the complaint have arisen in Australia (per my 11 July letter, point 2). In this case, I would then proceed to liaise with the parties to decide whether the issues raised warrant further examination against the criteria outlined in the OECD Implementation Procedures. This is required in the AusNCP Procedures para 30. It is the same process which would occur by any NCP conducting initial assessment of a complaint about non-compliance with the OECD Guidelines.

If you have any questions or uncertainties about the above, please let me know and I will try to resolve that with my colleagues in the AusNCP Secretariat. If I hear nothing further from you, this matter will proceed along the first path I described above.

Yours sincerely

John Southalan — Independent Examiner

Australian National Contact Point for Responsible Business Conduct

+61 2 6263 4410  | john.southalan@ausncp.gov.au  | ausncp.gov.au