Queensland Health 30 day Legal Warning
- agentorangechild
- Jun 8
- 3 min read
Subject: Formal Notice – TCDD Harm, Systemic Negligence, and Escalation to ICC and TOC Jurisdiction
Date: 26 May 2025
Dear
,
Thank you for your previous correspondence acknowledging my concerns regarding 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzodioxin (TCDD) and its intergenerational impacts.
This letter serves as formal 30-day notice to Queensland Health. Your department has failed to recognise or respond to clear, documented harm caused by TCDD exposure. The complaint has now escalated internationally and meets the legal threshold for crimes against humanity under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.
Failed Domestic Oversight
After filing my complaint with the Office of the Health Ombudsman (OHO), I was told it was “too complex.” The Queensland Ombudsman declined jurisdiction, and the Commonwealth Ombudsman confirmed that state-level health matters fall outside their scope.
This failure of oversight highlights the systemic nature of the harm, and the absence of any domestic mechanism willing or able to address it.
Medical Negligence – Escalated to AHPRA
I have formally escalated the conduct of three Queensland-based specialists to the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA):
ENT Specialist – Failed to inform me of serious congenital ear abnormalities and bilateral superior semicircular canal dehiscence visible on CT imaging. These findings were never disclosed, explained, or acted upon, despite ongoing neurological and vestibular symptoms.
Dr Gert Tollesson (2011) – Attributed my spinal deterioration to lifestyle factors (smoking), dismissed my accident history, and refused to acknowledge congenital or exposure-related causes.
Dr Adrian Smith – Referred me to a university gym “to keep me busy” while ignoring worsening hip, spine, and nerve pain, despite signs of degenerative neurological damage at age 44.
Each of these actions constitutes unprofessional conduct, failure to meet expected clinical standards, and performance that poses a risk to the public under the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (Qld).
Escalation to TOC and ICC – Corporate Accountability
This is not just a pattern of negligence—it is a deliberate failure to act in the face of overwhelming evidence, and it has enabled the continuation of systemic abuse and intergenerational suffering for chemically harmed civilians.
I have now formally included the corporate suppliers of TCDD:
Monsanto (now Bayer AG)
Dow Chemical (now Dow Inc.)
These companies have collectively made over $100 billion in profits, while victims of their products—especially the children of Vietnam veterans—have been dismissed, misdiagnosed, and denied support for decades.
This matter now meets the criteria for both:
Transnational Organised Crime (TOC): based on coordinated denial, state-corporate collusion, and cross-border human rights violations; and
Crimes Against Humanity under Article 7 of the Rome Statute, including:
“Inhumane acts causing great suffering or serious injury”
“Persecution against any identifiable group based on birth or health status”
“Acts committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack against a civilian population, with knowledge of the attack”
ICC Submission Timeline
Your department now has until 26 June 2025 to respond meaningfully and transparently. If you fail to do so, this non-response will be included in Annex B of my formal submission to the International Criminal Court, to be lodged on 1 July 2025 under Article 15 of the Rome Statute.
This is no longer a private grievance. This is part of an international criminal investigation.
Individuals are held accountable.
That includes government officials, medical professionals, and corporate actors who played a role in concealing or enabling harm.
After that, your silence will speak for you — forever.
Warm Agent Orange Burns regards,
Danielle Stevens
We will always be a child of a Vietnam Veteran
A formal complaint has been lodged the International Criminal Court for Crimes against Humanity.
All correspondence can be included in legal proceedings.
ReplyForward Add reaction |
Comments